Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 3/6/2006
Banashak v. Wittstadt
Citations
- 893 A.2d 1236
- 167 Md. App. 627
- 2006 Md. App. LEXIS 34
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “the appealability of each separate issue must be analyzed in a vacuum,” and “there are no two-for-the-price-of-one bargains on the appellate docket”
- “the appealability of each separate issue must be analyzed in a vacuum,” and “there are no two-for-the-price-of-one bargains on the appellate docket”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Krauser, Barbera, Moylan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Maryland Board of Physicians v. GeierCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2017-01-23· cited 23×
- Green v. NassifCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-10-15· cited 15×
- Maryland Board of Physicians v. GeierCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-10-01· cited 13×
- Green v. McClintockCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-08-01· cited 8×
- Green v. NelsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-04-28· cited 7×
- Estate of Castruccio v. CastruccioCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2020-07-29· cited 6×
- In the Estate of VessCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2017-09-28· cited 5×
- Battley v. BanksCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-12-19· cited 4×
- Russell v. GaitherCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-07-07· cited 4×
- Nassif v. GreenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-05-02· cited 2×
- United States v. O'BrienD. Maryland· 2018-12-03· cited 2×
- Commonwealth v. LeontiBerks County Court of Common Pleas· 2007-11-27
- In re: Estate of SchappellCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2024-02-28
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Rohrbeck v. RohrbeckCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-12-06· cited 173×
- Diener Enterprises, Inc. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1972-10-18· cited 63×
- Pegg v. WarfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1853-12-15· cited 44×
- Canterbury Riding Condominium v. Chesapeake Investors, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1986-03-10· cited 30×
- Schlossberg v. SchlossbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-08-04· cited 21×
- McIntyre v. SaltysiakCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-10-24· cited 21×
- Gordon v. Central Park Little Boys LeagueSupreme Court of Alabama· 1960-03-10· cited 19×
- Hill v. LewisCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1974-04-24· cited 19×
- Little Sisters of the Poor v. CushingCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1884-06-19· cited 18×
- Piper Rudnick LLP v. HartzCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-04-08· cited 16×
- Riddleberger v. GoellerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1971-10-13· cited 16×
- Pierce v. MoletCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-03-30· cited 16×
- Potter v. Bethesda Fire Department, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-02-05· cited 14×
- Bloomfield Royalty Corp. v. Carco Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1968-11-20· cited 14×
- Lusby v. NethkenCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1971-06-25· cited 13×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1973-02-06· cited 12×
- Young, Adm'x Young, Ex-parteCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1849-12-15· cited 11×
- Ades v. NorinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1954-03-25· cited 10×
- Senk v. MorkCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-10-01· cited 10×
- Wall v. HellerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-01-11· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.