Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Supreme Court· 1/10/1955

Baltimore Contractors, Inc. v. Bodinger

Citations

  • 348 U.S. 176
  • 75 S. Ct. 249
  • 99 L. Ed. 2d 233
  • 1955 U.S. LEXIS 1464
  • 99 L. Ed. 233

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the Enelow-Ettelson rule applies only to \a stay through equitable principles of a common-law action\
  • explaining that the Enelow-Ettelson rule applies only to “a stay through equitable principles of a common-law action”
  • noting the \incongruity of taking jurisdiction from a stay in a law type [proceeding] and denying jurisdiction in an equity type proceeding\
  • noting the “incongruity of taking jurisdiction from a stay in a law type [proceeding] and denying jurisdiction in an equity type proceeding”
  • refusing to permit interlocutory appeal on ground that order refusing to stay action pending arbitration is not order denying an injunction
  • refusing to extend doctrine even though “outmoded procedural distinctions” upon which doctrine is based led to incongruous result

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reed, Black, Burton, Douglas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

372 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Baltimore Contractors, Inc. v. Bodinger

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.