· 6/5/1950
Roberts v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California
Citations
- 339 U.S. 844
- 70 S. Ct. 954
- 94 L. Ed. 2d 1326
- 1950 U.S. LEXIS 1818
- 94 L. Ed. 1326
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “denial by a District Judge of a motion to proceed in forma pauperis is an appealable order”
- holding that denial of an IFP motion is an appealable order
- holding that denial of an IFP motion is an appealable order
- holding that denial of an IFP motion is an appealable order
- holding that denial of an IFP motion is an appealable order
- holding that denial of an IFP motion is an appealable order
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Frankfurter, Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.