Court of Appeals of Maryland· 7/12/2011
Ballard v. State
Citations
- 24 A.3d 96
- 420 Md. 480
- 2011 Md. LEXIS 436
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- demonstrating that a defendant was properly Mirandized, agreed to waive his rights, and then while later being interrogating, invoked his right to remain silent
- “In short, if, from the perspective of a reasonable officer, the suspect’s statement is not an unambiguous or unequivocal request for counsel, then the officers have no obligation to stop questioning him.”
- “In short, if, from the perspective of a reasonable officer, the suspect’s statement is not an unambiguous or unequivocal request for counsel, then the officers have no obligation to stop questioning him.”
- suspect invoked right to counsel by stating \I'd rather appoint a lawyer\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barbera
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Wimbish v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-09-29· cited 16×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-12-18· cited 12×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-10-01· cited 11×
- Phillips v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-03-16· cited 10×
- State v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2014-06-05· cited 9×
- Malaska v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-02-28· cited 6×
- Porter v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-10-25· cited 4×
- Madrid v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2020-10-01· cited 4×
- Gupta v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2017-03-24· cited 2×
- Vargas-Salguero v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-06-01· cited 2×
- Campbell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2025-10-02
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-06-24· cited 2,777×
- McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1991-06-13· cited 1,818×
- Berghuis v. ThompkinsSupreme Court· 2010-06-01· cited 1,592×
- Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1984-12-10· cited 1,225×
- Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-01-31· cited 57×
- State v. HarrisMissouri Court of Appeals· 2010-03-02· cited 25×
- In Re Synchronoss Securities LitigationD. New Jersey· 2010-04-07· cited 25×
- Matthews v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-11-03· cited 22×
- Prioleau v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-12-09· cited 21×
- Minehan v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-10-01· cited 14×
- McDaniel v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1998-10-27· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.