Baker v. Baker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that no special circumstances justified requiring the former husband to maintain life insurance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Nichols v. Nichols
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-07-27· cited 22×
• Layeni v. Layeni
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-02-28· cited 22×
• Ruberg v. Ruberg
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-11-07· cited 21×
• Forgione v. Forgione
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-05-21· cited 10×
• OTTO HANS VAN MAERSSEN v. DIANA GERDTS
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2020-05-06
• LISA KIM KARKHOFF v. THOMAS ANTHONY ROBILOTTA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2020-12-09

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Canakaris v. Canakaris
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-03-27· cited 2,288×
• Vaccaro v. Vaccaro
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-07-12· cited 22×
• Sasnett v. Sasnett
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-09-20· cited 14×
• Richardson v. Richardson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-12-31· cited 14×
• Moorehead v. Moorehead
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-12-08· cited 14×
• Hollinger v. Hollinger
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-12-11· cited 8×
• Goodwin v. Goodwin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-07-29· cited 6×