Ghori-Ahmad v. United States Commission on International Religious Freedom

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, at the motion to dismiss stage, “[the plaintiff] need only plead factual content from which this Court can reasonably infer that she was a [Department] employee”
• “To draw a distinction between employees and independent contractors is a ‘relatively open-ended, fact-intensive inquiry.’” (quoting Konah v. District of Columbia, 815 F. Supp. 2d 61, 70 (D.D.C. 2011)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).