Skip to main content

Bailey v. State

Citations

  • 493 A.2d 396
  • 63 Md. App. 594
  • 1985 Md. App. LEXIS 429

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because appellant was permitted to elicit same evidence from other witnesses, any error in limiting cross-examination of forensic serology expert was harmless
  • age groups are not “distinctive groups” for purposes of fair cross-section analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Getty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.