Supreme Court of Virginia· 4/21/2000

Bailey v. Commonwealth

Citations

529 S.E.2d 570
259 Va. 723
2000 Va. LEXIS 59

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting authenticated autopsy photographs where their relevance did not render them “unduly inflammatory”
holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting authenticated autopsy photographs where their relevance did not render them “unduly inflammatory”
finding premeditation where the defendant walked into a bedroom and shot the victim “twice in the head at close range”
finding sufficient evidence of premeditation where the accused walked into a bedroom and shot the victim “twice in the head at close range”
providing that a video “which is verified by the testimony of a witness as fairly representing what that witness has observed is admissible in evidence and . . . it need not be proved by the [individual] who made it”
finding premeditation where the defendant walked into a bedroom and shot the victim “twice in the head at close range”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carrico, Lacy, Hassell, Keenan, Koontz, Kinser, Compton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Bailey v. Commonwealth

36 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.