Bailey v. Bailey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an issue of will construction was a substantial defense precluding an award of attorney fees where “[t]he parties’ proffered constructions directly influenced and could have changed the proposed quantity of land to be taken by each individual party”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Marriage of Marr
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-06-30· cited 18×
• Clayton v. Bradford National Bank
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-09-21· cited 7×
• Bargman v. Wilson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2011-02-14· cited 1×
• McDunn v. McDunn
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2026-06-05

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Harris v. Johnson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-10-25· cited 30×
• In Re Estate of Lanterman
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1984-03-30· cited 11×
• Harrison v. Kamp
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1949-05-19· cited 10×
• Tucker v. Countryman
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1953-01-22· cited 9×
• Jackson v. O'CONNELL
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1964-02-04· cited 8×
• Adams v. Adams
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1947-11-20· cited 8×
• Lane v. Budiselich
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1974-03-14· cited 7×
• O'MALLEY v. Walker
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1955-03-07· cited 7×
• Bailey v. State Bank
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1983-12-30· cited 6×
• Schwartz v. Schwartz
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1952-04-18· cited 4×
• Maciaszek v. Maciaszek
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1963-10-01· cited 2×
• Kaiserman v. Kaiserman
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-03-20· cited 1×