Lane v. Budiselich

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the plaintiffs attorney acts for all the parties having interest in the property subject to a partition
• “The assertion by defendant in her motion that the complaint was multifarious does not constitute a good and substantial defense but rather the assertion of a technical defect at most.”
• in finding defendant did not raise a substantial defense, distinguishing cases where “genuine issues as to the nature and extent of the interests of the parties in the partition were tendered”
• assertion of a “technical defect” is not a good and substantial defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).