Skip to main content
· 9/21/1993

Clayton v. Bradford National Bank

Citations

  • 620 N.E.2d 643
  • 250 Ill. App. 3d 775
  • 189 Ill. Dec. 675

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that respective interests were seven-ninths to plaintiff and two-ninths to defendant
  • finding a substantial defense where defendant set forth her additional interest in the premises by virtue of plaintiff’s promise to reconvey
  • “The fixing of attorney fees and the allowance of those fees as apportioned costs are largely matters residing in the discretion of the trial court.”
  • the counterplaintiff was entitled to an apportionment of attorney fees for being the first party to properly set forth the rights and interests of the parties in the property to be partitioned
  • because the plaintiff failed to set forth the defendant's right to the reconveyance of a portion of the premises, it was necessary for the defendant to employ counsel, and an apportionment of the plaintiff's attorney fees was not appropriate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Welch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.