Autos, Inc. v. Gowin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the “theme often heard in this court: that it is absurd to say that a person has forfeited a right of action before he ever had one”
• damages claim relating to loss of military pay due to 1956 conviction was barred by six-year statute of limitations
• “The relief [plaintiff] now seeks [for back pay] was available in this forum at the time of his conviction....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).