· 10/31/2000
United States v. 162 MegaMania Gambling Devices
Citations
- 231 F.3d 713
- 31 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20242
- 2000 Colo. J. C.A.R. 6027
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 27097
- 2000 WL 1634741
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that opinion letters issued by the National Indian Gaming Commission are not entitled to Chevron deference
- examining similar class II gaming device and holding that it was not class III slot machine
- following “minority viewpoint” not accepting doctrine
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brorby, McKAY, Murphy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.