Gottlieb v. Kest

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing, although declining to follow, this rule
• applying Section 349 and holding that because bankruptcy court did not confirm plan prior to dismissal, the debtor’s debts and property were subject to general state laws, unaffected by bankruptcy concepts, and therefore creditor could pursue unpaid debt for full amount due
• default judgment with express findings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).