Skip to main content

Austin v. State

Citations

  • 151 P.3d 60
  • 123 Nev. 1
  • 123 Nev. Adv. Rep. 1
  • 2007 Nev. LEXIS 17

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing the district court’s decision as to whether a clinical social worker was qualified to perform a psychosexual evaluation for an abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Maupin, Gibbons, Hardesty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.