State v. STATE OF NEV. EMPLOYEES ASS'N, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that “plain and unambiguous” language within a statute “must be given effect” unless from the language of the statute “it clearly appears that such [an interpretation] was not so intended”
• “When a statute uses words which have a definite and plain meaning, the words will retain that meaning unless it clearly appears that such meaning was not so intended”
• “When a statute uses words which have a definite and plain meaning, the words will retain that meaning unless it clearly appears that such meaning was not so intended.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).