Nevada Supreme Court· 11/22/2000
Parrish v. State
Citations
- 12 P.3d 953
- 116 Nev. 982
- 116 Nev. Adv. Rep. 106
- 2000 Nev. LEXIS 117
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a sentencing determination will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion by the district court
- stating that a sentencing determination will not be disturbed on appeal unless the district court abused its discretion
- recognizing the district court is afforded wide discretion in sentencing
- \[Substantial-assistance] statutes are obviously intended to provide an incentive to drug-trafficking offenders to cooperate with law enforcement in the investigation of other drug traffickers.\
- this court will not disturb a sentence absent an abuse of discretion
- \[Ilhe district court is afforded wide discretion when sentencing a defendant.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shearing, Agosti, Leavitt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. LuceroNevada Supreme Court· 2011-03-17· cited 79×
- Johnson v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2004-05-19· cited 12×
- Blackburn v. State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court· 2013-02-14· cited 12×
- Austin v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2007-02-15· cited 4×
- BLANKENSHIP (LERON) VS. STATE C/W 66944Nevada Supreme Court· 2016-07-21
- Whitaker (Tennille) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2019-11-21
- Cotton (Ivan) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2020-02-05
- Stratton (Jason) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2020-03-17
- Bolden v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2023-10-19
- Bolden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Nevada· 2023-10-19
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 5,257×
- Deveroux v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1980-04-30· cited 43×
- Randell v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1993-02-04· cited 42×
- Martinez v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1998-07-16· cited 31×
- People v. MockelCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1990-12-20· cited 19×
- Matos v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1994-07-26· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.