Ausler v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that no conflict 4 with standby counsel existed when the defendant brought a frivolous, “purely imaginary” suit against his counsel (internal quotation marks omitted)
• holding that a defendant's claim that his name was copyrighted and that the Magistrate Judge was not authorized to use his name in court proceedings was \frivolous on its face\ and the copyright claim was \purely imaginary\
• refusing to apply Holloway outside the multiple representation context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).