Skip to main content
· 8/30/2012

United States v. Rasheed Shakur

Citations

  • 691 F.3d 979
  • 2012 WL 3733552

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “‘the forfeiture order’ [as used in Rule 32.2(b)(4)(C)] obviously means a preliminary forfeiture order entered” under Rule 32.2(b)(2)
  • explaining that “‘the forfeiture order’ [as used in Rule 32.2(b)(4)(C)] obviously means a preliminary forfeiture order entered” under Rule 32.2(b)(2)
  • district court stated at sentencing, “I am going to enter a forfeiture in this case” but did not specify the amount
  • district court stated at sentencing, “I am going to enter a forfeiture in this case” but did not specify the amount
  • court did not specify in judgment what property was forfeited and only later listed specific property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Gruender, Benton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.