· 8/30/2012
United States v. Rasheed Shakur
Citations
- 691 F.3d 979
- 2012 WL 3733552
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “‘the forfeiture order’ [as used in Rule 32.2(b)(4)(C)] obviously means a preliminary forfeiture order entered” under Rule 32.2(b)(2)
- explaining that “‘the forfeiture order’ [as used in Rule 32.2(b)(4)(C)] obviously means a preliminary forfeiture order entered” under Rule 32.2(b)(2)
- district court stated at sentencing, “I am going to enter a forfeiture in this case” but did not specify the amount
- district court stated at sentencing, “I am going to enter a forfeiture in this case” but did not specify the amount
- court did not specify in judgment what property was forfeited and only later listed specific property
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Loken, Gruender, Benton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.