UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, — v. JASON JERREL AUSLER, —

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an erroneous jury instruction, consistent with the indictment, became the “law of the case” for the purpose of reviewing defendant’s sufficiency challenge because the government failed to object to the instruction at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).