Court of Appeals of Maryland· 8/26/2019
Attorney Grievance v. Kane
Citations
- 465 Md. 667
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a conflict of interest arose between an attorney and the attorney’s clients when the attorney was joined as a defendant with the clients in an adversary proceeding
- concluding that a conflict of interest arose between an attorney and the attorney’s clients when the attorney was joined as a defendant with the clients in an adversary proceeding
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Booth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerOther cases named Attorney Grievance v. Kane
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.