Randall v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A repealing act which does not state whether it is to be applied retroactively or prospectively is ambiguous to that extent”
• “When the Illinois General Assembly repeals a statute, the presumption is that the repeal is `to be applied retroactively, unless there is an expression of legislative intent to the contrary' ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).