Skip to main content
· 7/6/2007

At & T ALASCOM v. Orchitt

Citations

  • 161 P.3d 1232
  • 2007 Alas. LEXIS 74
  • 2007 WL 1953667

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that hearing officer's position as vice president of workers' union was not sufficient to demonstrate actual or probable bias
  • holding that AT&T had waived issue regarding reliability of medical testimony because AT&T only raised the issue for the first time on appeal
  • stating that party must show \actual bias or prejudgment\ to refute presumption of honesty and impartiality of agency personnel
  • holding that Board “acted within its discretion” by admitting expert testimony
  • affirming Board when it rejected testimony of its own engineering expert
  • refusing to consider legal claim because of inadequate briefing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fabe, Matthews, Eastaugh, Bryner, Carpeneti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.