Schweiker v. McClure

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that courts \must start [] from the presumption that [] hearing officers ... are unbiased\
• holding that courts “must start [] from the presumption that [ ] hearing officers ... are unbiased”
• holding that courts “must start [] from the presumption that [ ] hearing officers ... are unbiased”
• recognizing that “[t]his presumption can be rebutted by a showing of conflict of interest or some other specific reason for disqualification”
• recognizing that “[t]his presumption can be rebutted by a showing of conflict of interest or some other specific reason for disqualification”
• recognizing that “[t]his presumption can be rebutted by a showing of conflict of interest or some other specific reason for disqualification”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).