Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2/21/2006

Asylum Hill Problem Solving Revitalization Ass'n v. King

Citations

277 Conn. 238
890 A.2d 522
2006 Conn. LEXIS 46

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that prongs “overlap to some extent with each other”
rejecting plaintiffs claim that General Statutes § 8-37cc [b] implicitly provides private right of action
rejecting plaintiffs claim that General Statutes § 8-37cc [b] implicitly provides private right of action
when “a statute, with reference to one subject contains a given provision, the omission of such provision from a similar statute concerning a related subject ... is significant to show that a different intention existed”
“[when] a statute, with reference to one subject contains a given provision, the omission of such provision from a similar statute concerning a related subject ... is significant to show that a different intention existed” [internal quotation marks omitted]
‘‘[when] a statute, with reference to one subject contains a given provi- sion, the omission of such provision from a similar statute concerning a related subject . . . is significant to show that a different intention existed’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Katz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.