Skip to main content
· 9/18/2007

Provencher v. Town of Enfield

Citations

  • 936 A.2d 625
  • 284 Conn. 772
  • 2007 Conn. LEXIS 510

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that test for granting summary judgment is whether \the party moving for summary judgment would be entitled to a directed verdict on the same facts [internal quotation marks omitted]\
  • rejecting plaintiffs claim that General Statutes § 22-331 [a] implicitly provides private right of action
  • reasoning that, where the legislature expressly provided a right of action for other provisions in a given title, but not the provision at issue, it is a strong indication the legislature did not intend to create such a cause of action
  • this court granted certification to appeal from judgment of Appellate Court reversing trial court’s summary judgment
  • this court granted certification to appeal from judgment of Appellate Court reversing trial court's summary judgment
  • “[T]here exists a presumption in Connecticut that private enforcement does not exist unless expressly provided in a statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Katz, Norcott, Rogers, Schaller, Zarella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.