ASTRAZENECA LP v. Apotex, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the district court “correctly determined” that lan- guage in the ANDA label “would inevitably lead some consumers to practice the claimed method”
• explaining that a court may rely on “uncontested expert testimony to explain how the invention described in the intrinsic record functions” in construing a term to avoid excluding an embodiment disclosed in the specification
• holding circumstantial evidence may suffice to prove specific intent to induce infringement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

72 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
  Federal Circuit· 2012-05-14· cited 109×
• Tecsec, Inc. v. Adobe Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2020-10-23· cited 93×
• Metalcraft of Mayville, Inc. v. the Toro Company
  Federal Circuit· 2017-02-16· cited 76×
• Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. West-Ward Pharmaceuticals
  Federal Circuit· 2018-04-13· cited 74×
• Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. v. West-Ward Pharmaceutical Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2015-05-06· cited 73×
• Eli Lilly and Company v. Teva Parenteral Medicines
  Federal Circuit· 2017-01-12· cited 68×
• Tinnus Enterprises, LLC v. Telebrands Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 2017-01-24· cited 53×
• Braintree Laboratories, Inc. v. Novel Laboratories, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2014-04-22· cited 38×
• Aia Engineering Ltd. v. Magotteaux Intern. S/A
  Federal Circuit· 2011-08-31· cited 34×
• BAYER SCHERING PHARMA AG v. Lupin, Ltd.
  Federal Circuit· 2012-04-16· cited 33×
• Sanofi v. Watson Laboratories Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2017-11-09· cited 29×
• Grunenthal Gmbh v. Alkem Laboratories Limited
  Federal Circuit· 2019-03-28· cited 28×
• In Re: Marco Guldenaar Holding B.V.
  Federal Circuit· 2018-12-28· cited 24×
• C R Bard Inc. v. Angiodynamics, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2020-11-10· cited 22×
• Praxair Distribution, Inc. v. Mallinckrodt Hosp. Prods. Ip Ltd.
  Federal Circuit· 2018-05-16· cited 20×
• Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
  D. New Jersey· 2015-04-16· cited 19×
• Natera, Inc. v. Neogenomics Laboratories, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2024-07-12· cited 19×
• In Re: Distefano
  Federal Circuit· 2015-12-17· cited 15×
• Takeda Pharmaceuticals, U.S.A., Inc. v. Burwell
  District of Columbia· 2015-01-13· cited 11×
• BTG Int'l Ltd. v. Amneal Pharm. LLC
  D. New Jersey· 2018-10-31· cited 9×

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 2008-11-12· cited 11,986×
• Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-Cross
  Federal Circuit· 2006-02-21· cited 3,273×
• Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1995-04-05· cited 2,940×
• Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1996-07-25· cited 2,428×
• Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-Cross
  Federal Circuit· 1998-03-25· cited 1,536×
• Innova/pure Water, Inc. v. Safari Water Filtration Systems, Inc. (Doing Business as Safari Outdoor Products)
  Federal Circuit· 2004-08-11· cited 753×
• Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.
  Supreme Court· 2005-06-27· cited 539×
• amazon.com, Inc. v. barnesandnoble.com, Inc. And barnesandnoble.com, LLC
  Federal Circuit· 2001-02-14· cited 435×
• Dsu Medical Corporation v. Jms Co., Ltd
  Federal Circuit· 2006-12-13· cited 310×
• Genentech, Inc. v. Novo Nordisk, A/s, Novo Nordisk of North America, Inc. And Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1997-05-12· cited 283×
• Vita-Mix Corp. v. Basic Holding, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2009-09-16· cited 189×
• Warner-Lambert Company v. Apotex Corp., Apotex, Inc., and Torpharm, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2003-01-16· cited 179×
• Titan Tire Corp. v. Case New Holland, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2009-06-03· cited 174×
• Abbott Laboratories v. Sandoz, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2009-05-18· cited 174×
• Ricoh Co., Ltd. v. Quanta Computer Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2008-12-23· cited 143×
• Netword, LLC v. Centraal Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 2001-03-14· cited 135×
• In Re Gleave
  Federal Circuit· 2009-03-26· cited 120×
• Novo Nordisk of North America, Inc., Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Novo Nordisk, A/s v. Genentech, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1996-04-16· cited 107×
• Golden Blount, Inc. v. Robert H. Peterson Co.
  Federal Circuit· 2006-02-15· cited 93×
• Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH
  Federal Circuit· 2001-02-01· cited 93×

Other cases named ASTRAZENECA LP v. Apotex, Inc.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• ASTRAZENECA LP v. Apotex, Inc.
  D. New Jersey· 2009-05-14· cited 8×
• ASTRAZENECA LP v. Apotex, Inc.
  D. New Jersey· 2009-05-22· cited 5×