Skip to main content
· 4/16/1996

Novo Nordisk of North America, Inc., Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Novo Nordisk, A/s v. Genentech, Inc.

Citations

  • 77 F.3d 1364
  • 1996 WL 82680

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the Federal Circuit stated that determining whether a patent specification was enabling would require “resolution of factual questions”
  • “claim 2 covers only a method of directly expressing human growth hormone and does not encompass a cleavable fusion expression process”
  • “[n]either the public interest nor equity favors grant of an injunction against one who does not infringe”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Archer, Rich, Lourie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.