· 4/16/1996
Novo Nordisk of North America, Inc., Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Novo Nordisk, A/s v. Genentech, Inc.
Citations
- 77 F.3d 1364
- 1996 WL 82680
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the Federal Circuit stated that determining whether a patent specification was enabling would require “resolution of factual questions”
- “claim 2 covers only a method of directly expressing human growth hormone and does not encompass a cleavable fusion expression process”
- “[n]either the public interest nor equity favors grant of an injunction against one who does not infringe”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Archer, Rich, Lourie
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.