Skip to main content

Asberry v. State

Citations

  • 507 S.W.3d 227
  • 2016 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1443
  • 2016 WL 7119059

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “all of the evidence that was before the trial court before it made its ruling should be available to, and considered by, the reviewing court” on appeal
  • holding that appellate 3 The State also argues that Article 39.14(k
  • explaining that “we do not see any reason to treat a review of a ruling pursuant to Article 64.04 differently than a ruling pursuant to Article 64.03”
  • explaining that “we do not see any reason to treat a review of a ruling pursuant to Article 64.04 differently than a ruling pursuant to Article 64.03”
  • instructing appellate courts that in reviewing a trial court’s article 64.04 finding, we review the entire record to determine whether appellant established that he would not have been convicted
  • “[W]e do not see any reason to treat a review of a ruling pursuant to Article 64.04 differently than a ruling pursuant to Article 64.03.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.