Flores v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[t]he scope of evidence that an appellate court may review on appeal from the denial of a post-conviction motion for DNA testing is not limited to evidence relating to the motion and/or hearing on the motion for DNA testing”
• explaining that “[t]he scope of evidence that an appellate court may review on appeal from the denial of a post-conviction motion for DNA testing is not limited to evidence relating to the motion and/or hearing on the motion for DNA testing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Asberry v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2016-12-07· cited 21×
• in Re Jamie Fletcher
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2020-02-14
• in Re Derek Rice
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2020-09-11

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Guzman v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-09-24· cited 6,556×
• Rivera v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-11-06· cited 551×
• Kutzner v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-04-10· cited 255×
• Dinkins v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-09-11· cited 124×
• Jacobs v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2003-11-05· cited 44×