Williams v. Lara

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that inmates did not satisfy the capable-of-repetition requirement because “[w]hether and when [they] may be charged with a crime that would lead to their incarceration ... is speculative”
• holding that inmates did not satisfy the capable-of-repetition requirement because \[w]hether and when [they] may be charged with a crime that would lead to their incarceration . . . is speculative\
• holding that case becomes moot if controversy ceases to exist between parties at any stage of proceedings
• holding that case becomes moot if a controversy ceases to exist between the parties at any stage of the proceedings
• concluding that a justiciable controversy between the parties must exist at every stage of the legal proceedings, including the appeal, or the case is moot
• concluding that claims for declaratory and injunctive relief were moot, but the damages claim was not

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).