Skip to main content
· 8/25/2009

Grasslands Plantation, Inc. v. Frizz-King Enterprises, LLC

Citations

  • 978 A.2d 622
  • 410 Md. 191
  • 2009 Md. LEXIS 626

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the subdivision applicant, as the party seeking to change the status quo by developing the site, bore the burden of proof
  • explaining that the subdivision applicant, as the party seeking to change the status quo by developing the site, bore the burden of proof
  • addressing the scope of the deference to be accorded to an agency’s interpretation of the laws it applies
  • “Another exception [to the presumption against retroactive application of statutes] is for remedial enactments that do not impair vested rights.”
  • “[A]n administrative agency’s interpretation and application of the statute which the agency administers should ordinarily be given considerable weight by reviewing courts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.