Arturo Barrientos v. Loretta E. Lynch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “As a general matter, we cannot consider extra-record evidence. We must limit our review of the merits of [the] petition to ‘the administrative record on which the order of removal is based.’” (citing 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(A))
• “As a general 2 18-72965 matter, we cannot consider extra-record evidence. We must limit our review of the merits of [the] petition to ‘the administrative record on which the order of removal is based.’” (citing 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(A))
• this court’s review is limited to the administrative record
• “As a general matter, we cannot consider extra-record evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Chavarria-Reyes v. Lynch
  Seventh Circuit· 2016-12-30· cited 18×
• Osei Fosu v. Garland
  Fifth Circuit· 2022-06-07· cited 14×
• Jose Chavarria-Reyes v. Loretta Lynch
  Seventh Circuit· 2016-12-30

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Houston v. Lack
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-24· cited 6,563×
• Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
  Supreme Court· 1995-04-19· cited 1,703×
• Sama Abdisalan v. Eric Holder, Jr.
  Ninth Circuit· 2015-01-06· cited 57×
• Chad Grady v. United States
  Eighth Circuit· 2001-10-15· cited 50×
• Mastag Garabed Haroutunian, AKA Ohannes Sassonian AKA Matsak Haroutunian AKA Matsag Haroutunian v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
  Ninth Circuit· 1996-06-26· cited 44×
• Alexei Sheviakov Tatiana Zakhartchenk O v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-01-26· cited 34×