Alexei Sheviakov Tatiana Zakhartchenk O v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “a file stamp later than the due date might not destroy jurisdiction where the petitioner could show that the clerk received the papers on time” (emphasis added)
• “Accordingly, we hold that under the current Ninth Circuit Rule 25–2, when the petition is mailed to our post office box, and tangible evidence (such as a notification slip
• “This deadline for filing is jurisdictional, and so there is nothing we can do about it if the filing came one day late.”
• “The petition was available for pickup the day it was due, June 23, but, as was the ordinary course, was not physically brought into the clerk’s office until the routine delivery the next morning.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).