Skip to main content
· 9/4/2014

Arthur Lavin v. Jon Husted

Citations

  • 764 F.3d 646
  • 2014 FED App. 0224P
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 17103
  • 2014 WL 4357564

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court abused its discretion relying on several impermissible considerations in a fee determination
  • “A plaintiffs ability to pay his or her attorney ... is irrelevant to the fee inquiry.”
  • “consideration of the taxpayers is ‘an improper ground for denying or reducing an attorney’s fee.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Siler, Gilman, Gibbons

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.