· 9/4/2014
Arthur Lavin v. Jon Husted
Citations
- 764 F.3d 646
- 2014 FED App. 0224P
- 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 17103
- 2014 WL 4357564
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the district court abused its discretion relying on several impermissible considerations in a fee determination
- “A plaintiffs ability to pay his or her attorney ... is irrelevant to the fee inquiry.”
- “consideration of the taxpayers is ‘an improper ground for denying or reducing an attorney’s fee.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Siler, Gilman, Gibbons
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.