First Technology Safety Systems, Inc., a Michigan Corporation v. Paul Depinet Steven Fuhr Barry Wade Vector Research, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the only type of injunctive relief that a district court may issue ex parte is a temporary restraining order”
• explaining that “[t]he only type of injunctive relief that a district court may issue ex parte is a temporary restraining order”
• finding it inappropriate to consider assertions against defensdeaen atlss ob EeCcaRuI sve. MtchGerraew h-Hadil l, bIneec.n no determination as to the accuracy of those assertions
• “An abuse of discretion exists the outcome of a civil rights action in Alabama, in which a when the district court applies the wrong legal standard. . . .”
• “The normal circumstance for which the district court would be justified in proceeding ex parte is where notice to the adverse party is impossible, as in the cases where the adverse party is unknown or is unable to be found.”
• “The normal circumstance for which the district court would be justified in proceeding ex parte is where notice to the adverse party is impossible, as in the cases where the adverse party is unknown or is unable to be found.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).