Skip to main content
· 4/29/1983

Arrowhead Construction Co. v. Essex Corp.

Citations

  • 662 P.2d 1195
  • 233 Kan. 241
  • 1983 Kan. LEXIS 305

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that \the amount of damages was not liquidated until the trial court found there was a contract for $1.35 per square foot and entered judgment accordingly\
  • binding agreement can exist “even though one or more terms are missing or left to be agreed upon”
  • requiring proof of meeting of minds and manifestation of intent to be bound
  • when the amount past due on a contract and the date it was due are certain, the creditor is entitled to interest from the date due
  • contractor and surety estopped from excluding sub-subcontractor from coverage of statutorily inadequate bond

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Herd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.