Augusta Bank & Trust v. Broomfield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the statute of frauds was designed to prevent fraud and injustice and shouldn’t be used as a shield to protect fraud
• ‘Where the evidence pertaining to the existence of a contract is conflicting a question is presented for the trier of fact.”
• \Where the evidence pertaining to the existence of a contract is conflicting a question is presented for the trier of fact.\
• question whether the parties have entered a contract depends on the intent of the parties, and intent is a question of fact for the jury
• \The controlling question as to whether a binding contract was entered into depends on the intention of the parties and is a question of fact.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).