Skip to main content
· 4/7/1973

Urban Renewal Agency v. Reed

Citations

  • 508 P.2d 1227
  • 211 Kan. 705
  • 1973 Kan. LEXIS 448

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that generally questions of law must be determined by the court, unlimited by agreement of the litigants; their stipulations as to what the law is are ineffective to bind the court
  • reversing district court for basing its holding on an erroneous stipulation of the law between the parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Foth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.