Arrington v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that it is error to permit the State to call a witness to contradict collateral answers given dining the State’s cross-examination of another witness
• holding error was not harmless because credibility was a major issue in the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tripoli v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-12-29· cited 6×
• Daeda v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-04-04· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. DiGuilio
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
• Williams v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1959-03-25· cited 1,148×
• Richardson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1971-03-31· cited 927×
• Saffor v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-07-13· cited 50×
• Lawson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-02-08· cited 19×
• Moore v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-08-04· cited 4×