Skip to main content
· 12/31/2002

Arnold Industries, Inc. v. Love

Citations

  • 2002 UT 133
  • 63 P.3d 721
  • 464 Utah Adv. Rep. 3
  • 2002 Utah LEXIS 224
  • 2002 WL 31890187

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the after-acquired title statute \has codified in part the equitable doctrine of estoppel by deed\
  • considering whether a grantee’s reliance was reasonable when the defective grant was a matter of public record
  • “To allow a grantor to deny the terms of its conveyance after acquiring title by repudiating an easement originally intended to be granted would be an invitation to fraud and would contravene the central purpose of the equitable doctrine of estoppel by deed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howe, Having, Durham, Durrant, McIff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.