Ault v. Holden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding mutual acquiescence where the parties \regarded the fences as the true boundary lines\ (emphasis added)
• \overrulling] the fifth [boundary by acquiescence] requirement of objective uncertainty contained in Holladay v. Cluff\
• “Extrinsic evidence is admissible to illuminate the intent of the parties if the terms of a deed are ambiguous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).