Skip to main content

Armstrong v. State

Citations

  • 983 S.W.2d 643
  • 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 104
  • 1999 WL 38975

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “where the Appellant does not complain that defense counsel used those challenges against people Appellant wanted on the jury, this court finds no merit in Appellant’s claim that Defense Counsel was ineffective in failing to use a peremptory strike ... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crow, Parrish, Prewitt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.