Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1/20/1993
Armstrong v. State
Citations
- 845 S.W.2d 909
- 1993 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 9
- 1993 WL 7631
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “the court below wholly failed to address the question of whether the prosecutor had a separate duty to disclose the relationship”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Coble v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-11-03· cited 206×
- Armstrong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-03-29· cited 175×
- Rankin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-10-22· cited 141×
- Armstrong v. RandleTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1994-06-28· cited 109×
- Turro v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1997-07-03· cited 83×
- Fontenot v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1996-08-16· cited 21×
- Armstrong v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1993-03-23· cited 13×
- Jerald D. Clark v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1994-06-29
- Gilbert Chapoy v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1994-06-22
- Milton Powell v. StateTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2003-12-31
- Lawrence Werdlow, III v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2005-08-22
- Fuelberg, BennieCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-01-15
- Martin, Peter JamesCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-01-23
- Earbin, Lennie P.Texas Supreme Court· 2015-07-15
- Blocker, Gordon StanleyCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-05-22
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.