Skip to main content
· 12/11/1991

Imo v. State

Citations

  • 822 S.W.2d 635
  • 1991 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 283
  • 1991 WL 258860

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that appellant “automatically invoked” Article 38.23 by arguing evidence should be excluded for violations of state constitutional and statutory law
  • defendant who moves to suppress evidence on statutory grounds automatically invokes article 38.23

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.