Skip to main content
E.D. Wisconsin· 9/5/1984

Armstrong v. Snyder

Citations

  • 103 F.R.D. 96
  • 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23887

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that, because “there [wa]s no requirement that the plaintiff prepare a pleading responsive to the defendant’s amended answer[,] . . . the plaintiff’s request for a more definite statement of the answer [wa]s wholly unwarranted and w[ould] be denied on that basis.”
  • denying motion for a more definite statement of an answer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warren

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.