Zappala v. Hub Foods, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Pennsylvania law “requires that the proceeding alleged to be the misuse of legal process terminate in favor of the defendants before the defendant’s claim for [malicious prosecution] is ripe for adjudication” (citing 42 Pa. C.S.A. § 8351)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).