SV International, Inc. v. Fu Jian Quanyu Industry Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying the defendant's motion to suppress evidence obtained from the use of real- time, cell-site location information because of law enforcement officers' good-faith reliance on subsection 2702(c)(4) of the Stored Communications Act
• stating, in case regarding Government “pinging” target cell phone, that “[a] Fourth Amendment analysis entirely dependent upon the fortuity of a criminal defendant entering his or her own home during the pinging process is likely to prove [ ] unworkable.... ”
• “[T]he need to obtain and preserve critical evidence in the investigation of a serious crime constitutes exigent circumstances.” (quotation marks omitted)
• “This investigative technique, commonly referred to as cell phone ‘pinging,’ consists of the cell phone carrier surreptitiously accessing by satellite the cell phone’s GPS location, or if unavailable, its location in terms of its proximity to the nearest cell phone tower.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).