Skip to main content
· 7/9/1987

Armstrong v. Aramco Services Co.

Citations

  • 746 P.2d 917
  • 155 Ariz. 345
  • 1987 Ariz. App. LEXIS 451

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It is the well established 22 law of Arizona that in order to prevail upon a theory of unjust enrichment, a plaintiff must 23 establish that, (1) plaintiff conferred a benefit upon the defendant; (2) defendant’s benefit 24 is at plaintiff’s expense; and (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Contreras, Brooks, Strick, Tern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.