Bosland v. Warnock Dodge, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the CFA affords a remedy for plaintiffs of a class with \nominal\ claims that otherwise \might go unvindicated\
• noting that a “plaintiff must suffer a definite, certain and measurable loss, rather than one that is merely theoretical”
• holding that a consumer need not make a pre-suit demand for a refund before filing a CFA claim; but distinguishing Thiedemann and noting that the present case did not involve a defect that could be remedied through a warranty or other alternate form of relief
• noting that Court’s role “is to determine and effectuate the Legislature’s-intent”
• requiring plaintiff prove “definite, certain and measurable loss” to succeed on CFA claim
• defining term “ascertainable loss” to “mean[] that plaintiff must suffer a definite, certain and measurable loss, rather than one that is merely theoretical”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).